VANDI4U | SCORE | ||
---|---|---|---|
Safety | 2 |
Our safety score is based on the Global NCAP crash test ratings.
The protection offered to the driver head and chest was poor and the passenger’s chest received marginal protection. The passengers’ knees could impact with dangerous structures in the dashboard. The bodyshell was rated as unstable and can not withstand further loadings.
The child seat for the 3 year old child was not able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and the biomechanical readings were above the limits. The dynamic performance of the 18 months child restraint was adequate. However, the installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. Both CRS were compatible with the belt system on the vehicle. This vehicle was not equipped with a passenger airbag.
VANDI4U | SCORE | ||
---|---|---|---|
Safety | 2 |
Our safety score is based on the Global NCAP crash test ratings.
The protection offered to the driver head and chest was poor and the passenger’s chest received marginal protection. The passengers’ knees could impact with dangerous structures in the dashboard. The bodyshell was rated as unstable and can not withstand further loadings.
The child seat for the 3 year old child was not able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and the biomechanical readings were above the limits. The dynamic performance of the 18 months child restraint was adequate. However, the installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. Both CRS were compatible with the belt system on the vehicle. This vehicle was not equipped with a passenger airbag.
VANDI4U | SCORE | ||
---|---|---|---|
Safety | 2 |
Our safety score is based on the Global NCAP crash test ratings.
The protection offered to the driver head and chest was poor and the passenger’s chest received marginal protection. The passengers’ knees could impact with dangerous structures in the dashboard. The bodyshell was rated as unstable and can not withstand further loadings.
The child seat for the 3 year old child was not able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and the biomechanical readings were above the limits. The dynamic performance of the 18 months child restraint was adequate. However, the installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. Both CRS were compatible with the belt system on the vehicle. This vehicle was not equipped with a passenger airbag.